Oct 1, 2007
12:00 PM, By Michael Fickes
Mixed-use
real estate developments are re-inventing security
Of the 3,000
or so retail shopping centers in the United States, a little more
than 130 of them mix together various kinds of commercial real
estate space including retail, entertainment, office, residential
apartments, condominiums and hotels.
Called mixed-use
developments, these properties are proliferating like wildfire.
And they are re-energizing the retail shopping center business,
while adding to the security challenge.
Mixed-use
developments are revitalizing residential areas in urban cores;
they are making sustainable, environmentally-friendly communities
around mass transit stops; they are adding town centers to suburban
bedroom communities; and they are providing central gathering
places for several rural communities.
Security considerations
affect the design of mixed-use developments, as well as the security
strategies developed to protect the developments and the selection
of security technologies.
Crime
prevention design
Most mixed-use developments contain similar kinds of space. They
include retail, entertainment and one or more other kinds of commercial
and residential space.
In physical
design, however, the developments differ dramatically from one
another, usually depending upon how the space is allocated among
the various uses.
In addition,
mixed-use projects generally contain streets with on-street parking,
and individual retail, restaurant and entertainment storefronts
located at street level. The buildings, which may rise two to
several stories, may feature apartments, condominiums and offices
on the upper floors. In some developments, single-family homes
and high-rise condominium or apartment towers spring up next to
the retail and office development. In other cases, mixed-use developments
surround urban mass transit stops.
Given the
complexity of mixed-use centers, security receives a lot of attention
during the design of the property. Chief among the design techniques
related to security is Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design (CPTED), says Jonathan G. Lusher, ICCPA, executive vice
president and principal consultant with IPC International in Bannockburn,
Ill.
“Right
now, our firm is working on CPTED concepts for three mixed-use
centers in suburban developments,” says Lusher. “And
we're preparing to start a fourth in India.”
According
to Lusher, CPTED dictates first and foremost that designs eliminate
architectural techniques that form nooks or hiding places inside
and outside of a structure.
Beyond that
consideration, mixed-use creates a number of issues for designers
to address with CPTED in mind. “You are not just designing
a shopping center, an office building or a condominium development,”
Lusher says. “You are designing several types of properties,
and you have to think carefully about the interfaces between each.”
For instance,
he continues, a person may visit the property to shop, eat dinner
or see a movie, but he or she should not be able to enter a lobby
leading to an office suite or a group of apartments.
While access
control technology will control the doors in this example, CPTED
design controls the flow of people starting at the parking lot.
“Sometimes we use physical barriers to separate public parking
spaces from office and residential parking,” Lusher says.
“Office workers and residents also want guaranteed parking
spaces, so we'll provide spaces for them in enclaves close to
the office and residential sections.”
Issues
affecting mixed-use security strategies
With or without a qualified CPTED design, security professionals
must develop security strategies tailored to the individual designs
of mixed-use facilities.
Unlike malls,
which feature the same general design concept, mixed-use developments
are different from project to project, and so the approach to
security must necessarily change. “There is no single model
for security at a mixed-use development,” says Donald H.
Green, a principal with Strategic Security Concepts Inc., a consulting
firm based in Skaneateles, N.Y. “Each is handled differently
because of the configuration of the buildings, the locations of
the different uses, the streets and the parking facilities.”
No matter
what kind of property needs to be secured, Green begins building
a security strategy by working up a threat analysis based on four
factors:
- The location
of the center and the kinds of buildings located around it.
- The nature
and use of the property: Consider the configuration of the development;
the office and retail tenant mix, the entertainment concepts
and restaurants; the balance between apartments and condominiums;
and which property types are adjacent to each other.
- The demographics,
which provide insight into what kind of security operation the
property will require. Is it in a wealthy and highly-educated
community? Is it a stable middle-class community?
- The history
of crime on the property and in the surrounding neighborhood.
Green notes
that developers generally negotiate agreements with local jurisdictions
during the permitting process. These agreements will assign certain
security responsibilities to the developer and others to the police.
In the case
of a mixed-use center, the agreements may assign unusual responsibilities
to the private security team. Mixed-use centers, for example,
have streets. Are these city streets or private streets? Who will
patrol the streets? Private security or the police?
“Typically,
police departments don't want to delegate anything to private
security that goes beyond what private security normally does,”
Green says. “But if there are narrow streets, they may create
an official relationship between the department and the private
security group and allow security officers to write tickets.
“Whether
or not private security's responsibilities go beyond normal, the
security director, supervisor and senior officers need to have
a relationship with the police department. Who is the local police
patrol commander? How will that person work with security people?”
Security directors
will also meet with representatives from associations of apartment
owners as well as condo associations to discuss security expectations
on the one hand and capabilities on the other. These discussions
will cover issues such as what private security can and will do
and when the police will be called to come onto the property.
Security
technologies and mixed-use
In a way, security technology, both old and new, is making mixed-use
centers practical.
Take access
control. Malls do not use card access control. Keys, gates and
a patrolling security officer are reasonably effective and much
less expensive. If something gets stolen, it is unfortunate, but
not a tragedy.
On the other
hand, security at mixed-use centers must take into account residents
that remain on the property continuously. It is unacceptable for
a resident's car to be stolen, for his or her home to be burglarized
or for someone living on the property to become the victim of
violent crime.
In a mixed-use
center, doors to lobbies with elevators leading to residences
on upper floors probably should have electronic controls with
card or biometric access, says David Levenberg, senior vice president
with the mall security division of Andrews International and formerly
the director of security for General Growth Properties, a Chicago-based
mall owner. Levenberg also recommends card access for the elevators,
so that if someone followed a resident into a lobby he or she
would get stuck on the ground floor.
Offices, back
doors and loading docks for the retail shops, restaurants and
parking lots will also benefit from the increased security provided
by electronic card access control, Levenberg continues.
For parking
garages and other public areas in mixed-use properties, Levenberg
recommends emergency call boxes with associated video cameras.
“You will have residents walking dogs late at night out
along the street,” he says. “If something happens,
the resident goes to the call box, pushes a button to speak to
a security officer, while a camera swings around and focuses on
the caller.”
“Malls
often do not deploy video camera systems, but it is difficult
not to install cameras in a mixed-use center.”
While there
is no legal requirement to monitor live video captured by security
cameras, unless monitoring has for some reason been written into
a contract, Levenberg says a mixed-use owner will be much better
off if the cameras are monitored.
Of course,
there is never any guarantee that a security officer monitoring
video will see an incident.
Levenberg,
Green and Lusher all express interest in an emerging technology
called video analytics, which automates the job of monitoring
video. “This is an exciting, affordable technology that
is beginning to push intelligence out into the cameras and digital
video recorders,” Lusher says.
According
to Levenberg, Andrews International has been talking to video
analytics companies about developing analytics tied to behaviors
that mixed-use security officers look for.
The company
is currently experimenting with an analytic that sends an alarm
upon what is called “lurking behavior.” “Suppose
someone has gotten into the lobby of a residential building but
cannot make the access controlled elevator work,” Levenberg
says. “So the person goes into the stairwell. A system that
identifies lurking will alarm on this behavior and tell the officer
in the security center.”
Other behaviors
that Andrews International wants video analytics to detect include
intercept behavior. If a camera sees one person walking in a parking
lot or garage and one or more other people walking on an intercept
path with the first person, the system will alarm. “It may
not be anything,” Levenberg says. “But it might be
trouble, and we would like to make sure.”
Andrews International
has also asked about detecting a vehicle behavior in a parking
lot. In this case, the system would alarm when a vehicle in a
parking lot drives up and down the aisles ignoring available parking
spaces.
“We're
also interested in standard motion detection,” Levenberg
says. “We would use this in cameras set in service corridors
or elevator lobbies. When there is movement, video would come
up on a monitor in the security center so that an officer can
check it. If it is a resident coming in, the operator can greet
the individual over an intercom system. If it is a bad guy, the
officer will dispatch help.”
Levenberg
also touts another emerging camera technology for mixed-use developments:
a 360-degree camera. “Suppose you place a camera on the
ceiling in the middle of a lobby,” he says. “The operator
can only see where the camera is looking at any given time. If
something happens behind the camera, the operator won't see it,
nor will it be recorded.
“With
a 360-degree camera, the operator still can see only where the
camera is looking, however, the camera will record a 360-degree
view. So even if I'm notified after the fact that an assault took
place, I can still review the recording,” he says.
Many of these
techniques and technologies are in use at Santana Row in San Jose,
Calif., a mixed-use center with retail, restaurants, spas, a hotel
and residences developed by Federal Realty Investment Trust, based
in Rockville, Md.
“They
have an arrangement with the San Jose Police Department, which
patrols the property at designated times,” says Green, who
helped Santana Row select a contract security company.
The center
also uses electronic access control in the parking garages and
the entrances to the condominium lobbies. The hotel on the property
has set up its own security team, which is common. Retailers are
also responsible for security in their shops, just as they would
be in a mall.
Dozens of
cameras ring the property, monitoring the parking garages and
the common areas along the walkways in front of the shops.
Security officers
patrol the property 24-hours a day, while officers staff the property's
security center monitoring the video and access control system.
If you would
like additional information please contact ElectricEyes at 306-347-0606
or info@electriceyes.com.